The Book of Dads Read online

  The Book of Dads

  Essays on the Joys, Perils, and Humiliations of Fatherhood

  Edited by Ben George

  This book is for

  my daughter,

  Lucy,

  who likes to swing.

  How do you like to go up in a swing,

  Up in the air so blue?

  Oh, I do think it the pleasantest thing

  Ever a child can do!

  —ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON, “THE SWING”

  And

  for my father,

  Daniel.

  Ah! yes, his children are to every man as his own soul; and whoso sneers at this through inexperience, though he suffers less anguish, yet tastes the bitter in his cup of bliss.

  EURIPIDES, Andromache

  Contents

  Epigraph

  Introduction

  The Night Shift

  Ben Fountain

  The Chaos Machine

  Charles Baxter

  In Ten Years He’s Got a Chance to Be Thirty

  Jim Shepard

  The Job, by the Numbers

  Clyde Edgerton

  What I Can Offer

  Neal Pollack

  Candy Man

  Rick Bragg

  Nine Times (Among Countless Others) I’ve Thought About the People Who Came Before Us in My Brief Career as a Father

  Anthony Doerr

  For Ella

  Michael Thomas

  Zeke

  Davy Rothbart

  Fault

  Richard Bausch

  Here Comes the Sun

  Nick Flynn

  Comparative History

  Brandon R. Schrand

  Notes from Adolescence

  Rick Bass

  A Year in the Life of a Homebound Wanderer, Master Avery in Attendance

  Sebastian Matthews

  The Sleepwalker

  Jennifer Finney Boylan

  Everyone into the Bunker!

  Steve Almond

  A Tale of Two Fathers

  David Gessner

  Eleven Thoughts on Being the Father of Eleven-Month-Old Twin Boys

  Darin Strauss

  Remember the Banana

  Brock Clarke

  The Points of Sail

  Sven Birkerts

  Contributors

  Acknowledgments

  About the Editor

  Credits

  Copyright

  About the Publisher

  Introduction

  For Mother’s Day, a few months before my daughter, Lucy, was born, I bought my wife, Meg, a copy of Anne Lamott’s Operating Instructions, which charts Lamott’s first year with her son. Meg waited till Lucy was born and then read the book bit by bit throughout our daughter’s first year. Almost every night, propped on my pillow beside her in bed, I would hear the titters start.

  “What?” I’d ask. “What’s so funny?”

  “Anne’s son just grimaced and passed gas when he saw George Bush Sr. on TV,” she told me. Or “Anne just called her infant son a ‘little shit.’”

  My wife (and I through her) was getting that feeling we all cherish when reading someone else’s unafraid, honest observations: I’m not the only one! Though we hadn’t admitted it to anyone besides each other, we’d certainly already felt that kind of deranged frustration when Lucy refused to be mollified even when it appeared that we had met every conceivable need. It no longer seemed unbelievable to us that someone, ravaged by fitful sleeplessness, might shake her baby. Incredibly sad and heartbreaking, yes, but unbelievable, no.

  I cannot overstate how good it was for my wife and me to have those moments of laughter together as she read Lamott’s book. Because we knew that in a few short hours (or less) we ourselves would be losing sleep. More than the laughs, though, or the insights, Lamott’s book was providing Meg with comfort…fortitude, even. No parent we’d talked with before Lucy was born could give us what that book was giving Meg.

  When Meg’s twelve weeks of maternity leave were up, and I, with my half-time editor’s job, found myself entirely alone with my daughter two days a week, it didn’t take long to realize just how bankrupt the platitudes and assurances people had been offering me beforehand really were. Maybe the parents I’d talked with as a single man thought that if they let the real truth slip, I might be dissuaded from joining their club. (Once you’re a parent, you understand this sentiment. You desire fellow sufferers, as well as others who get all the in-jokes. Would a recent New Yorker cartoon in which a ferocious, psychopathic-looking toddler in her jammies is taking a chainsaw to the family couch while her parents calmly confide to their guests, “She gets this way when she’s tired,” have been as funny to me before I was a father?) Nobody mentioned, for instance, that regular showering is the first thing to go. On any given day there might well be a few million new fathers masking their musk with enough deodorant to make it through undetected. It is hard to explain how a shower—that once rote morning activity—comes to be regarded as something you must do, an action that must be completed. But if you get a few minutes before the first wail emanates from behind your child’s closed door, whether it’s in the early-morning dark or during an afternoon nap, you’re desperate to get something “accomplished,” and in the hierarchy of pressing tasks a shower doesn’t make the cut as often as it once did.

  At some point in all of this, it began to dawn on me how much I wanted, like my wife, a book to bolster me, a companion that could plumb the numinous qualities of fatherhood. I’m not sure when I admitted this need for solace. Was it the long night that my wife and I awoke to the bleating baby monitor for the third time, around four a.m., and in an attempt to fuel myself I popped a cup of coffee into the microwave, only to discover the next morning, when the cup had been among the missing for several hours, that I’d put it in the freezer instead?

  To be fair, it wasn’t only solace I sought, it was also a chance to glimpse another father witnessing the wonder of a new life developing—and not just any new life, but one he himself had a hand in creating. These moments, too, were at the heart of my fatherhood experience: Lucy lifting her stuffed bunny to the bedroom window so the bunny could see outside, or her exuberant squeals and laughing jags as she chased soap bubbles across the backyard.

  A book like Operating Instructions, despite its many pleasures, was, to state the obvious, written by a mother; also, my innate skepticism tends to prevent me from taking just one person’s word on the matter, which made the idea of an anthology appealing. What’s more, it wasn’t only the early years of fatherhood that I wanted to know about. I’m impatient—I wanted to know about the whole shebang. Inveterate worrier that I am, already I cast ahead to the Drugs Talk, the Independence Talk, the Yes But You Can’t Always Believe Boys When They Tell You They Love You Talk.

  Whenever the need for this book first took hold of me, once it had me it became a permanent jones. I wanted a collection of essays that reached for what it means to be a father—from beginning to end. In what ways, for instance, was it different to be a father than a mother? What did it mean to be a good dad versus a bad dad? And why did there seem to be so much talk, and so many books, about motherhood, but not that much discussion, at least as far as I could tell, about fatherhood? (Witness, for just one example, the supposedly gender-neutral magazine Parenting, whose subtitle, unsubtly, was until very recently What Matters to Moms.) It couldn’t be that fathers just weren’t interested in fatherhood—the practice, the difficulties and the gratifications, the way it redirects a man’s life—not according to the conversations I was having.

  But when I started to look for a book like this anthology, my Amazon.com search for “fatherhood” returned this: “Did you mean ‘motherhood’?” (On and off, ever since
, I have heard this sentence in my head—like a catchy pop song I hate or the Tickle Me Elmo laugh—as some kind of tape-looped voice-over questioning whether fatherhood is really all that important an undertaking.) I scrolled down the page of results and saw that my hunt had yielded a gaggle of books purporting to instruct me on how to keep my baby alive until my wife got home and how to remain a mack daddy even in the grip of new fatherhood. There were plenty of sophomoric how-to or self-help guides masquerading as memoirs, all claiming, in general, to show me how to master the entire endeavor. But if there was one thing I’d learned in my brief stint as a dad, it was that fatherhood was never going to be something you mastered. And while I could understand the desperation of wanting to be rescued by the arrival of one’s wife, that wasn’t the book I was looking for, either. Sure, I wanted to know about the practical stuff. But most of all I wanted to read the writers I admired telling me something true about this new experience of fatherhood, a life change for which I grasped early on how poorly equipped I’d been. (And I had chosen to do this, I often reminded myself. It had been on purpose!) Of course there were great fictional examples to show me the kind of sacrifices this brave new world might entail. And I returned to some of my favorites—Andre Dubus’s chilling “A Father’s Story,” for one. But what I wanted, ultimately, was something directly from the writers’ lives: the pure, uncut, undiluted, unvarnished skinny. The nonfiction book that took fatherhood, in all its permutations, seriously, and that was seriously funny, didn’t seem to exist.

  But could I really trust the writers in this book (a number of whom, there’s no denying, are mostly fiction writers) to do that? It’s true, of course, that not all literary icons are fatherly exemplars. Hemingway’s blunt advice was this: “To be a successful father…there is one absolute rule: when you have a kid, don’t look at it for the first two years.” Frederic Henry, Hemingway’s character from A Farewell to Arms, compares his newborn son to a “freshly skinned rabbit” and supposes that he might someday “get fond of it maybe.” There’s a gallows humor in Henry’s terminology, and a good-natured leave-the-nurturing-to-the-women smirk in the Hemingway observation. But the strong silent father type became déclassé a good while ago. Gone are the days when it was acceptable, maybe even desirable, for a dad to be remote, enigmatic, impenetrable, emotionally inaccessible, unknowable. The Provider. When your responsibility was little more than to secure shelter, food, clothing—to make sure your children did not maim or kill themselves before they reached legal age. Maybe fathers in prior generations didn’t know better. Now we understand that if we don that well-worn coat we’ll probably be the root of years of expensive biweekly therapy for our children. The job requirements for today’s father seem to have proliferated. They are unique to the age: achieving a precarious balance between manliness and sensitivity.

  Many, many dads, I discovered—as I talked with more and more of them—were trying to forge a fatherly identity, to determine what kind of father to be. The idealized family life, we soon figure out, often seems pitted against our own individual lives and careers and pursuits (even more so now that these careers frequently blow us around the country, away from family members and friends who might otherwise assist us in the exhausting child rearing we’re doing). How did things fit together, your old life and this new forevermore life? Once a father myself, I could not imagine the chaos that ruled my life reigning in the lives of the literary personages I admired. It was impossible for me to conceive of a contemporary hero like Richard Ford—much less Hemingway, who talked of sitting down at his typewriter and bleeding—doing anything as depressingly pedestrian as standing over a changing table, elbow-deep in a tar-filled diaper, or hosing down a vomit-covered car seat in the backyard. Grace under pressure indeed. But such unglamorous things had become just a fact of life, a standard part of my existence.

  Of course, to portray the opposite of the strong silent father, the “involved” hands-on dad, can be just as problematic. Such attempts can come across as stagy or contrived. We have a hard time believing them—or I do, anyway. Not long ago I came across a photo of the late and much-beloved George Plimpton sitting near his disarrayed desk, rolling a sheet of paper into his typewriter. He gazes out his Seventy-second Street apartment window into the apotheosizing bars of bright sunlight. Meanwhile, behind him, on a plush rug, lie his two young twin daughters, head to toe, each contentedly sucking on a bottle of milk as Plimpton goes about his important work. The skeptic in me could almost hear Plimpton, as soon as the photo was snapped, calling out, “All right, that’s a wrap,” and asking the nanny to whisk the girls to the park. Ha! If it were me, as soon as I’d rolled in the fresh sheet of paper and Lucy had finished her milk, I’d have to make sure she wasn’t poking the dog in the eye, or climbing the bookshelf, or playing in the toilet water.

  Though a picture like the one of Plimpton and his twins may have accurately captured a moment, in my experience it’s ultimately dishonest in what it suggests to the viewer, which is that one’s own individual pursuits and the sacrificial nature of fatherhood somehow exist in unperturbed symbiosis. Parenthood will almost certainly provide the writer some new material, but it probably won’t aid in getting that material written down. Ford, in fact (who doesn’t happen to have any children), once quipped that he thought each child a writer had was probably equivalent to at least one fewer book in output. (Faulkner said, unapologetically, that Keats’s “Ode on a Grecian Urn” was worth any number of old ladies. So how many children is Independence Day or Rock Springs worth?) But I’ve also heard Ethan Canin say that anything the writer loses in terms of time or creative output by having children is offset by a tremendous gain in his own depth of feeling.

  Bearing these various complexities in mind, the essays in this book have pleased me in both their honesty and their balance. They’re full of the joy, the pleasure of being a dad, the incomparable kick of it, the profligacy of a father love that cannot be contained or summed up. But there’s also the humor, the pain, the self-doubt, even the desire, at times, to be anything other than a dad. Fatherhood, to borrow a phrase from Vince Vaughn’s character in the movie Swingers, isn’t all “puppy dogs and ice cream.” Raymond Carver, for instance, while conceding, in his tour de force essay “Fires,” that there were some good times in his fathering years—certain “satisfactions that only parents have access to”—also claimed he’d “take poison” before reliving that time. He describes the influence his children exerted on his life as “a negative one, oppressive and often malevolent,” “heavy” and “baleful.” When he finds himself stymied in a Laundromat one Saturday afternoon, he reflects that fatherhood, for him, is a job of “unrelieved responsibility and permanent distraction,” a situation that has formed his life into “a small-change thing for the most part, chaotic, and without much light showing through.”

  You won’t find any essays here with a vision quite so bleak. But even those of us with the most generous outlook on fatherhood have known dark moments, times when a one-room cabin in the Yukon Territory begins to sound very appealing. Still and all, I’ll wager everything I have that not one of the writers here would give it up. Not for love or money.

  There’s a final thing I want to recall. It’s the weird unexpected sadness I had after my daughter’s second birthday, when we no longer measured her age in months. Saying your daughter is seventeen months old—that can be deceptively reassuring: you think you’ll have forever to get to know her. It comes as a tugging pang when you remember that you won’t. One outward reminder is that every time you gain command of the fatherly skills needed for a period in your child’s life, she’s on to the next stage, and everything you just painstakingly figured out is now mostly obsolete. Even though it happens slowly enough that I can’t quite tell, every day my daughter is a little bit taller, she’s a little bit smarter, and almost every step she takes now is another step away from me. Slow down, I want to tell her. What’s the big hurry? Stick around a while. For once she was born, I n
ow had my prime yardstick for time’s inexorable progress. I understood on a more visceral level how it wasn’t going to slow down for me, much less be stopped. If my sojourn on the planet goes as it should, there’s a lot of Lucy’s life I’m going to miss. I wouldn’t want it the other way around—unthinkable—and yet it’s still a little bit crushing to think of the years she’ll have that I’ll know absolutely nothing about. Because even though I realize I can’t know everything about her, I want to learn whatever I can.

  That’s the trick of fatherhood. We tend to think that, in the father-child bond, it’s the dad who does the teaching. But in fact it’s fathers who learn from their children. Peter De Vries, the seldom-remembered comic novelist (and father of four children), put it this way: “The value of marriage is not that adults produce children but that children produce adults. Who of us is mature enough for offspring before the offspring themselves arrive?” De Vries is certainly right.

  And yet children do more than make us grow up. They make us grow down. Before Lucy was born, I had long ago forgotten what it was like for each day to be brand-new. Her wonder, her insuppressible curiosity, helped me to remember. Whenever we would head out to the car to go somewhere, she would stop every couple of feet along the walkway to finger a flower petal or a bush. This capacity is what Wordsworth is getting at when he declares the child to be the father of the man. The world is something by which we ought to be enraptured. This is what the child teaches the man. Wordsworth wanted to keep this feeling his whole life. He wished for his heart never to stop leaping up when he beheld a rainbow. “Or let me die!” he proclaims, if he should lose that way of seeing things.